On 31 March 2026, the Office of the Commissioner General for Refugees and Stateless Persons (CGRS) announced that it would temporarily suspend the notification of certain decisions in cases concerning applicants from Lebanon, in view of the current situation in the country.

In a judgment delivered in Case C-184/24 (Sidi Bouzid), the Court of Justice of the European Union has clarified the limits of sanctions that may be imposed on applicants for international protection who refuse to be transferred to another accommodation centre. The Court found that such a refusal cannot justify the withdrawal of all material reception conditions. While Member States may impose sanctions for serious breaches of reception rules, these must remain proportionate and respect the applicant’s dignity. 

On 26 November 2025, several civil society organisations, including Caritas International and Vluchtelingenwerk Vlaanderen, published a statement warning about rising refusals of temporary protection applications. Between January and October, 2.380 applications were rejected, compared with 1.578 in 2022. The organisations highlighted difficulties in accessing accommodation and support for displaced persons affected. Authorities attribute the increase to changes in European rules and stricter administrative requirements.

Op 19 juni 2025 heeft het Hof van Justitie van de Europese Unie een uitspraak gedaan naar aanleiding van een verwijzingsvraag van de Franstalige Rechtbank van Eerste Aanleg te Brussel over beroepsprocedures na weigering van studentenvisa. De verwijzing volgde op zorgen geuit door Belgische advocaten en de NGO CIRÉ, die benadrukten dat late kennisgeving van weigeringen vaak verhindert dat studenten effectief beroep kunnen instellen. Het Hof verduidelijkte dat, hoewel geen spoedprocedure verplicht is, nationale systemen moeten waarborgen dat visumbeslissingen en daaraan gerelateerde beroepsprocedures tijdig worden afgehandeld, zodat een zinvolle rechterlijke toets mogelijk is.

In its judgments in cases C-8/22, C-663/21 and C-402/22, the Court clarified the conditions for revoking or refusing refugee status with regard to a third-country national who is convicted of a crime. The individual concerned must, inter alia, constitute a genuine, present and sufficiently serious threat to one of the fundamental interests of society and the decision must observe the principle of proportionality.